Download PolyADAA: Improving Aliasing Reduction in Memoryless Nonlinearities Using Lagrange Interpolation and Polynomial Approximation Reducing the aliasing of nonlinear functions is an important problem in digital signal processing. The introduction of the Antiderivative Antialiasing (ADAA) method brought many benefits and is an active area of research. The current bottleneck in terms of aliasing reduction is the initial conversion from discrete- to continuous-time, which was previously done by linear interpolation. In this paper we derive PolyADAA, a method for computing the ADAA output when this conversion is done using higher order Lagrange interpolation. To obtain a viable solution, the nonlinear function is approximated using Chebyshev polynomials, which enable the ADAA integral to be computed. The paper provides numerical examples to show the effectiveness of the approach and discusses the advantages of the method.
Download Evaluating AI Coding Assistants in Audio DSP Education: A Small Scale Study Recent advances in AI-assisted coding tools raise questions about how programming-intensive subjects such as audio digital signal processing should be taught and how exam projects should be evaluated. This paper presents a small-scale controlled exploratory study conducted in a graduate course on music DSP. As a final project at the end of the course, the students implemented a modular synthesizer plugin in C++. Half of the students had access to AI-assisted coding support, while the other group developed the plugin manually. All students had to follow a protocol and provide data at the end of the project, together with their code, which was discussed with them as part of the course exam. Although the scale of the study is small, the paper shares a qualitative analysis of the results and a few takeaway messages for future reference among lecturers in the field. Overall, AI-assisted coding does provide some advantage to students but only in certain regards. The used AI tools, trained on GitHub repositories, seem to have only partial awareness of the state of the art in digital audio processing (e.g. antialiasing oscillators, virtual analog filters, etc.). Finally, the use of AI seems to not interfere excessively with the ability of the students to learn from their practical experience.
Download A Corpus-Driven Parametric Modal Reverberator A parametric modal reverberator is presented in which synthesis parameters are derived from a large, curated corpus of room impulse responses (IRs). The collected responses are subjected to modal decomposition, yielding per-mode frequencies, damping coefficients, and residue amplitudes, together with a short early-reflection finite impulse response (FIR) filter. From the decomposed data, a feature table is constructed per IR comprising standard acoustic indices, per-band damping and density statistics, amplitude distributions, and FIR descriptors—50 variables in total. Six acoustically meaningful user controls are selected; since these exhibit substantial pairwise correlations across the corpus, they are orthogonalised via principal component analysis (PCA) prior to regression.
Download DAFx Challenge Introduction & Results The 1st DAFx Parameter Estimation Challenge is an open initiative to advance the state of the art in parameter estimation for acoustic modeling. Stated as a system identification problem, this first edition focuses on plate reverberation—an archetypal dense, modal and weakly damped acoustic system. Participants tackled two tasks: (A) estimating the physical parameters of a vibrating plate from its impulse response, and (B) recovering the modal parameters of the same system. Both rest on a simulation framework based on the damped Kirchhoff–Love plate equation, and both are posed and scored entirely on synthetic data produced by that framework: no measurement of a real plate is involved. Two participants solved Task A down to machine precision by different strategies: one a neural network trained on a very large dataset, and one gradient-free optimization with many inexpensive evaluations. Task B proved considerably harder: the best submission attains a relative error of 0.33 on a [0, 2] scale, and every method recovers modal frequencies and decay rates far more accurately than modal gains. A complementary frequency-domain evaluation reorders the ranking and exposes a systematic gain bias to which the per-mode metric is blind.